Everyone has the same models now. The difference is what you point them at. Most tools prompt a general-purpose model with “write a LinkedIn post about X”, which is why the feed reads the way it does. Each account here gets a voice profile built from what that person has already published, and it gets sharper every time you edit a draft.
Used by leaders from
Two years ago an AI-written post passed. Now readers spot it in the first line and discount everything after it, which makes a bad draft worse than no post at all.
Three-beat sentences, a rhetorical question, a tidy lesson. It is not wrong, it is just identical to the four hundred other posts published that morning.
Delve, tapestry, testament, navigate the landscape. Words almost nobody used in 2022 and everybody’s drafts use now.
A model can produce the shape of a story but not the number, the date or the thing someone actually said. Those are the parts people remember, and they have to come from you.
Sentence length, how they open, whether they use lists, how formal they are, the words they reach for. Built per account, from real posts rather than a questionnaire.
A voice note, a rough paragraph, a link, a bullet. The model shapes what you give it; it does not invent the facts, and it will not pretend to.
Every change you make is a signal. If you always cut the rhetorical question, it stops writing them. The first fortnight is the worst it will ever be.
The same checks as our free post roaster run inside the editor, so the phrases that read as machine-written get flagged before anyone else sees them.
This is where most tools quietly fall over, and it is the whole reason we built ours the way we did.
A single tone setting across every account means the engineer, the founder and the recruiter all post in the same register. Anyone following two of your clients notices, and it is the fastest way for a ghostwriter to get found out.
Each connected account carries its own profile, trained separately. Give the same brief to two accounts and you get two genuinely different posts, which is the point.
What this does not do: make you interesting. It reproduces how you say things, not what you have to say. If the input is a generic thought, the output is a generic post that sounds like you wrote it, and that is arguably worse. The raw material still has to come from a person who noticed something.
Fourteen days free, no card. Connect one account, let it read what you have written, and see whether the first draft sounds like you.
From $19 a month for one account. Teammates and approvers are free.